Brachiocephalic and Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas in Patients with Tunneled Dialysis Catheters Have Similar Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) have a time-sensitive need for a functional permanent access due to high risk of catheter-associated morbidity. Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (BCF) have been reported to have higher maturation and patency compared to radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RCF), although more distal creation is encouraged when possible. However, this may lead to a delay in establishing permanent vascular access and, ultimately, TDC removal. Our goal was to assess short-term outcomes after BCF and RCF creation for patients with concurrent TDCs to see if these patients would potentially benefit more from an initial brachiocephalic access to minimize TDC dependence. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative hemodialysis registry was analyzed from 2011 to 2018. Patient demographics, comorbidities, access type, and short-term outcomes including occlusion, reinterventions, and access being used for dialysis, were assessed. RESULTS: There were 2,359 patients with TDC, of whom 1,389 (58.9%) underwent BCF creation and 970 (41.1%) underwent RCF creation. Average patient age was 59 years, and 62.8% were male. Compared with RCF, those with BCF were more often older, of female sex, obese, nonindependently ambulatory, have commercial insurance, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, be on anticoagulation, and have a cephalic vein diameter of ≥3 mm (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis for 1-year outcomes for BCF and RCF, respectively, showed that primary patency was 45% vs. 41.3% (P = 0.88), primary assisted patency was 86.7% vs. 86.9% (P = 0.64), freedom from reintervention was 51.1% vs. 46.3% (P = 0.44), and survival was 81.3% vs. 84.9% (P = 0.02). Multivariable analysis showed that BCF was comparable to RCF with respect to primary patency loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.36, P = 0.316), primary assisted patency loss (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.72-1.29, P = 0.66), and reintervention (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.27, P = 0.92). Access being used at 3 months was similar but trending towards RCF being used more often (odds ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.49-1, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BCFs do not have superior fistula maturation and patency compared to RCFs in patients with concurrent TDCs. Creation of radial access, when possible, does not prolong TDC dependence.

Axillary-bifemoral and axillary-unifemoral artery grafts have similar perioperative outcomes and patency.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that more bypass outflow targets for bypass grafts improve patency and outcomes. Our objective was to examine this in a multicenter contemporary series of axillary to femoral artery grafts. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for all axillary-unifemoral (AxUF) and axillary-bifemoral (AxBF) bypass grafts performed between 2010 and 2017 for claudication, rest pain, and tissue loss. Patients with acute limb ischemia were excluded. Patients' demographics and comorbidities as well as operative details and outcomes were recorded. Univariable, multivariable, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess long-term outcomes. RESULTS: There were 412 (32.9%) AxUF grafts and 839 (67.1%) AxBF grafts identified. Overall, the mean age of the patients was 68.3 years, 51.1% were male, and 84.7% were white. Compared with AxBF grafts, AxUF grafts were more often performed for urgent cases; in patients who were younger, male, nonambulatory, and diabetic; and in those with preoperative anticoagulation, critical limb ischemia, prior bypass, aneurysm repair, peripheral vascular intervention, and major amputation (P < .05 for all). There were no significant differences between AxUF and AxBF grafts in perioperative wound complications (4.2% vs 2.9%; P = .23), cardiac complications (7.3% vs 10.4%; P = .08), pulmonary complications (4.1% vs 6%, P = .18), early stenosis/occlusion (0.2% vs 0.8%; P = .22), perioperative mortality (2.9% vs 3.2%; P = .77), and length of stay (6.4 ± 5.6 days vs 6.7 ± 8 days; P = .29). The mean estimated blood loss (268.1 mL vs 348.6 mL; P < .001) and mean operative time (201 minutes vs 224.1 minutes; P < .001) were significantly lower for AxUF grafts. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that AxUF and AxBF grafts had similar freedom from graft occlusion (62.6% vs 71.8%; P = .074), major adverse limb event-free survival (57.1% vs 66.6%; P = .052), and survival (86% vs 86%; P = .897) at 1 year. Major amputation-free survival was lower for AxUF grafts (63.7% vs 73%; P = .028). Multivariable analysis also showed that the type of graft configuration did not independently predict occlusion/death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.46; P = .72), amputation/death (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83-1.51; P = .45), major adverse limb event/death (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.3; P = .85), or mortality (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.65-1.26; P = .55). Three-year survival after placement of AxUF and AxBF grafts was similar (75.1% vs 78.2%; P = .414). CONCLUSIONS: AxUF and AxBF grafts have similar perioperative and 1-year outcomes. Graft patency was not significantly different between an AxBF graft and an AxUF graft at 1 year. Overall, patients treated with these reconstructions have many comorbidities and low long-term survival.

Trauma and BMI Mortality.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obesity has been recognized as an impactful comorbid condition. It has been demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality following trauma. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple studies and reviews have strongly suggested obesity to be associated with increased risk for post-injury morbidity and mortality. As obesity is associated with a pro-inflammatory state, it has been suggested to negatively affect the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and renal systems and the ability and manner in which an obese patient heals. As obesity continues to rise at alarming rates in the USA, this population of patients requires special consideration and continued research is underway to delineate relationships between obesity, trauma, and outcomes in an effort to improve overall care.